Skip to content

LOWE, JOHN J.: Transitive Nouns and Adjectives.

DOI https://doi.org/10.29091/KRATYLOS/2020/1/10

Laura Grestenberger


1 Baker, Mark C. und Nadya Vinokurova. 2009. On agent nominalizations and why they are not like event nominalizations. Language 85/3: 517–56. [Crossref]

2 Bresnan, Joan und John Mugane. 2006. Agentive nominalizations in Gĩkũyũ and the theory of mixed categories. In M. Butt, M. Dalrymple & T. Holloway King (Hrsg.), Intelligent linguistic architectures: Variations on themes by Ronald M. Kaplan, 201–34. Stanford, CA: CSLI.

3 Butt, Miriam und King, Tracy Holloway. 2004. The status of case. In V. Dayal & A. Mahajan (Hrsg.), Clause structure in South Asian languages, 153–98. Boston, MA: Kluwer. [Crossref]

4 Geldner, Karl F. 1951–57. Der Rig-Veda aus dem Sanskrit ins Deutsche übersetzt, 4 Bd. (Harvard Oriental Series 33–36). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

5 Gotō, Toshifumi. 2013. Old Indo-Aryan morphology and its Indo-Iranian background. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. [Crossref]

6 Grassmann, Hermann. 1873. Wörterbuch zum Rig-Veda. 6., von Maria Kozianka überarb. und ergänzte Aufl., 1996. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

7 Grestenberger, Laura. 2013. The Indo-Iranian cákri-type. JAOS 133/2: 269–93. [Crossref]

8 Grestenberger, Laura. 2017. On “i-substantivizations” in Vedic compounds. In B. S. S. Hansen, A. Hyllested, A. R. Jørgensen, G. Kroonen, J. H. Larsson, B. Nielsen Whitehead, T. Olander & T. Mosbæk Søborg (Hrsg.), Usque ad radices: Indo-European studies in honour of Birgit Anette Olsen, 193–206. Museum Tusculanum.

9 Grestenberger, Laura. 2018. Deponency in finite and nonfinite contexts. Language 94/3: 487–526. [Crossref]

10 Grestenberger, Laura. 2020. The diachrony of participles in the (pre-)history of Greek and Hittite: losing and gaining functional structure. Diachronica 37/2: 215–63. [Crossref]

11 Hale, Mark. 2019. Methodological preliminaries to the study of Indo-European syntax: The Vienna Lectures. Ms., Concordia University.

12 Jamison, Stephanie W. und Joel P. Brereton. 2014. The Rigveda: The earliest religious poetry of India, 3 Bd. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

13 Kiparsky, Paul. 2016. The agent suffixes as a window into Vedic grammar. In D. Gunkel, J. T. Katz, B. Vine & M. Weiss (Hrsg.), Sahasram ati srajas: Indo-Iranian and Indo-European studies in honour of Stephanie W. Jamison, 170–92. Ann Arbor, MI: Beech Stave.

14 Kümmel, Martin J. 2017. Partizipien und Verbaladjektive als Prädikate im Indoiranischen. In C. Le Feuvre, D. Petit & G.-J. Pinault (Hrsg.), Verbal adjectives and participles in Indo-European languages, 141–58. Bremen: Hempen.

15 Lowe, John J. 2013. Indo-European “transitive” nouns and the accusative of experiencer. In S. W. Jamison, H. C. Melchert & B. Vine (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, 122–36. Bremen: Hempen.

16 Lowe, John J. 2014. Transitive nominals in Old Avestan. JAOS 134/4: 553–77. [Crossref]

17 Lowe, John J. 2015. Participles in Rigvedic Sanskrit: The syntax and semantics of adjectival verb forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Crossref]

18 Lowe, John J. 2017. The Sanskrit (pseudo-)periphrastic future. Transactions of the Philological Society 115/2: 263–94. [Crossref]

19 Ohala, John J. und Markus Ettlinger. 2006. The optimal nose. In Proceedings of CLS 42, main session, 239–52. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.

20 Tichy, Eva. 1995. Die Nomina Agentis auf -tar- im Vedischen. Heidelberg: Winter.

Share


Export Citation